DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) scores 20.7 points higher (45.4 vs 24.7) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($365 vs $227; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 45.4 | +83.8% GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is 83.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $227.10 | $364.95 | +60.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is 60.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 3.01s | 18.82s | +525.2% GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is 525.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 83.8% more intelligence, 60.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 525.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill