DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) scores 3.8 points higher (28.5 vs 24.7) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($449 vs $239; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 28.5 | +15.4% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 15.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $449.37 | +88.1% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 88.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.90s | 5.41s | +86.6% GPT-6 Sol (Non-reason… is 86.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 15.4% more intelligence, 88.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 86.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill