DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Grok 4.3 (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.3 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.3 (High) scores 0.2 points higher (24.9 vs 24.7) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($363 vs $239; both mid-range class). Pick Grok 4.3 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | Grok 4.3 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 24.9 | +0.8% Grok 4.3 (High) is 0.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $363.24 | +52.0% Grok 4.3 (High) is 52.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.71s | 27.84s | +927.3% Grok 4.3 (High) is 927.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (High) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 0.8% more intelligence, 52.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 927.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Grok 4.3 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Grok 4.3 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/grok-4-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/grok-4-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill