DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) scores 19.1 points higher (39.5 vs 20.4) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($672 vs $451; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 20.4 | −48.4% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 48.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $450.76 | −32.9% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 32.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.37s | 6.55s | −57.4% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 57.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 48.4% less intelligence, 32.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill