DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) scores 18.8 points higher (39.5 vs 20.7) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($672 vs $331; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 20.7 | −47.6% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 47.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $331.24 | −50.7% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 50.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.92s | 53.29s | +257.2% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 257.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $0.20 / $1.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 47.6% less intelligence, 50.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 257.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-5-4-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-5-4-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill