DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) scores 8.6 points higher (48.1 vs 39.5) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($909 vs $525; both premium class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 48.1 | +21.8% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 21.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $524.72 | $909.01 | +73.2% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 73.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.97s | 83.46s | +457.5% GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is 457.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 21.8% more intelligence, 73.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 457.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-1-terra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-1-terra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill