DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 11.4 points higher (50.9 vs 39.5) but costs 5.6× as much to run the benchmark ($2925 vs $526; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (High) when you need intelligence above 39.5, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) when 39.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | GPT-6 Astra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 50.9 | +28.9% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 28.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $525.65 | $2,925.01 | +456.5% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 5.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.08s | 93.68s | +521.2% GPT-6 Astra (High) is 521.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (High) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 28.9% more intelligence, 456.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 521.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- GPT-6 Astra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)GPT-6 Astra (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-astra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-astra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill