DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) scores 12.9 points higher (52.4 vs 39.5) but costs 5.7× as much to run the benchmark ($3803 vs $672; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 39.5, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) when 39.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 52.4 | +32.7% GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is 32.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $3,802.98 | +466.0% GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is 5.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.37s | 176.59s | +1048.9% GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is 1048.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 32.7% more intelligence, 466.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1048.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-astra-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-astra-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill