DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs GPT-6 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) scores 5.3 points higher (39.5 vs 34.2) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($672 vs $269; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Sol (Low).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | GPT-6 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 34.2 | −13.4% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 13.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $268.73 | −60.0% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 60.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.00s | 6.10s | −59.3% GPT-6 Sol (Low) is 59.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Low) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 13.4% less intelligence, 60.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)GPT-6 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill