DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) scores 4.7 points higher (44.2 vs 39.5) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($855 vs $672; both premium class). Pick GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 44.2 | +11.9% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 11.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $854.60 | +27.2% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 27.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.03s | 42.26s | +181.2% GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is 181.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 11.9% more intelligence, 27.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 181.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)GPT-6 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill