DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Grok 4.6 (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.6 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (High) scores 4.8 points higher (44.3 vs 39.5) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1963 vs $672; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.6 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | Grok 4.6 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 44.3 | +12.2% Grok 4.6 (High) is 12.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $1,962.90 | +192.1% Grok 4.6 (High) is 2.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.92s | 31.72s | +112.6% Grok 4.6 (High) is 112.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (High) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 12.2% more intelligence, 192.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 112.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Grok 4.6 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Grok 4.6 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/grok-4-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/grok-4-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill