DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Jamba 1.6 Large

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Jamba 1.6 Large. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Jamba 1.6 LargeDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)39.56.0−84.8% Jamba 1.6 Large is 84.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$671.96Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.00sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.29 / $1.20—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/jamba-1-6-large · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/jamba-1-6-large?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill