DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Ling-flash-2.0

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Ling-flash-2.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
39.50
Total cost
$672
InclusionAILing-flash-2.0Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Ling-flash-2.0Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)39.57.8−80.3% Ling-flash-2.0 is 80.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$671.96Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)14.98s112.65s+652.0% Ling-flash-2.0 is 652.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.29 / $1.20$0.14 / $0.57
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): what beats itLing-flash-2.0: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/ling-flash-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/ling-flash-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill