DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) scores 30.2 points higher (39.5 vs 9.3) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($672 vs $44.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 9.3 | −76.5% Llama 4 Maverick is 76.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $43.98 | −93.5% Llama 4 Maverick is 93.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.00s | 10.45s | −30.3% Llama 4 Maverick is 30.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 76.5% less intelligence, 93.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill