DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Ministral 3 8B
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or Ministral 3 8B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) scores 34.0 points higher (39.5 vs 5.5) but costs 24× as much to run the benchmark ($672 vs $27.5; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) when you need intelligence above 5.5, and Ministral 3 8B when 5.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | Ministral 3 8B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 5.5 | −86.1% Ministral 3 8B is 86.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $27.47 | −95.9% Ministral 3 8B is 95.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.04s | 4.90s | −67.4% Ministral 3 8B is 67.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.15 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 8B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 86.1% less intelligence, 95.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Ministral 3 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Ministral 3 8BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/ministral-3-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/ministral-3-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill