DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 12.9 points higher (52.4 vs 39.5) but costs 8.6× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $672; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 39.5, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) when 39.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 52.4 | +32.7% Muse Wonder (Max) is 32.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $5,786.78 | +761.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 8.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.00s | 40.70s | +171.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 171.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 32.7% more intelligence, 761.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 171.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill