DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
39.50
Total cost
$672
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)39.526.7−32.4% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 32.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$671.96Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)14.98s16.26s+8.5% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 8.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.29 / $1.20$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill