DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-23.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) scores 30.3 points higher (39.5 vs 9.2) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($600 vs $405; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 9.2 | −76.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 76.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $599.70 | $405.10 | −32.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 32.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.93s | 7.37s | −43.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 43.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 76.7% less intelligence, 32.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 43.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill