DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) scores 15.4 points higher (39.5 vs 24.1) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($672 vs $502; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Mini 4.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 24.1 | −39.0% Solar Mini 4 is 39.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $502.02 | −25.3% Solar Mini 4 is 25.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.98s | 27.46s | +83.3% Solar Mini 4 is 83.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 39.0% less intelligence, 25.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 83.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill