DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 16.4% less intelligence, 212.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 20.4 | −16.4% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 16.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $144.48 | $450.76 | +212.0% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 3.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 6.57s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill