DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) scores 22.6 points higher (47.0 vs 24.4) but costs 29× as much to run the benchmark ($3465 vs $121; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 24.4, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) when 24.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 47.0 | +92.6% GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is 92.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $3,464.84 | +2758.8% GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is 29× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 91.96s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 92.6% more intelligence, 2758.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/gpt-5-6-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/gpt-5-6-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill