DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 27.4 points higher (51.8 vs 24.4) but costs 8.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1082 vs $121; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) when you need intelligence above 24.4, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) when 24.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 51.8 | +112.3% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $1,081.55 | +792.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is 8.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 220.48s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 112.3% more intelligence, 792.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/gpt-6-1-sol · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/gpt-6-1-sol?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill