DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) scores 15.1 points higher (24.4 vs 9.3) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($121 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Maverick.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 9.3 | −61.9% Llama 4 Maverick is 61.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $43.98 | −63.7% Llama 4 Maverick is 63.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 10.43s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 61.9% less intelligence, 63.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill