DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 55.3% more intelligence, 9.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 37.9 | +55.3% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 55.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $109.55 | −9.6% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 9.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 49.53s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill