DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Ministral 3 3B
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or Ministral 3 3B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) scores 19.6 points higher (24.4 vs 4.8) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($144 vs $12.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) when you need intelligence above 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B when 4.8 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Ministral 3 3B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 4.8 | −80.3% Ministral 3 3B is 80.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $144.48 | $12.23 | −91.5% Ministral 3 3B is 91.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 3.13s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.10 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 3B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 80.3% less intelligence, 91.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Ministral 3 3B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Ministral 3 3BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/ministral-3-3b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/ministral-3-3b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill