DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Ministral 3 8B
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or Ministral 3 8B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) scores 18.9 points higher (24.4 vs 5.5) but costs 4.4× as much to run the benchmark ($121 vs $27.5; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) when you need intelligence above 5.5, and Ministral 3 8B when 5.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Ministral 3 8B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 5.5 | −77.5% Ministral 3 8B is 77.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $27.47 | −77.3% Ministral 3 8B is 77.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 5.26s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.15 / $0.15 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 8B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 77.5% less intelligence, 77.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Ministral 3 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Ministral 3 8BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/ministral-3-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/ministral-3-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill