DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Mistral Small 3.2
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)
Mistral Small 3.2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 71.3% less intelligence, 0.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Mistral Small 3.2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 7.0 | −71.3% Mistral Small 3.2 is 71.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $121.78 | +0.5% Mistral Small 3.2 is 0.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 9.99s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.07 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Mistral Small 3.2Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/mistral-small-3-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/mistral-small-3-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill