DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) scores 14.5 points higher (38.9 vs 24.4) but costs 9.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1185 vs $121; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 24.4, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) when 24.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 38.9 | +59.4% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 59.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $1,184.90 | +877.6% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 9.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 17.05s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 59.4% more intelligence, 877.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill