DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores 15.4 points higher (39.8 vs 24.4) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($363 vs $121; both mid-range class). Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.4 | 39.8 | +63.1% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 63.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $121.20 | $362.72 | +199.3% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 3.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 50.47s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High): 63.1% more intelligence, 199.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (High)Qwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420-high/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill