DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) scores 6.2 points higher (30.4 vs 24.2) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($277 vs $149; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 30.4 | +25.6% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 … is 25.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.48 | $277.30 | +85.5% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 … is 85.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 103.74s | 47.98s | −53.7% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 … is 53.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max): 25.6% more intelligence, 85.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/deepseek-v4-pro-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/deepseek-v4-pro-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill