DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max): 15.7% less intelligence, 201.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.5% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 20.4 | −15.7% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 15.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.48 | $450.76 | +201.6% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 3.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 103.74s | 6.74s | −93.5% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 93.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill