DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) vs GLM-5.3-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) by DeepSeek or GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3-Flash scores 17.6 points higher (41.8 vs 24.2) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($306 vs $149; both mid-range class). Pick GLM-5.3-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) | GLM-5.3-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 41.8 | +72.7% GLM-5.3-Flash is 72.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.48 | $305.52 | +104.4% GLM-5.3-Flash is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 107.06s | 38.89s | −63.7% GLM-5.3-Flash is 63.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.15 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GLM-5.3-Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max): 72.7% more intelligence, 104.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)GLM-5.3-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/glm-5-3-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/glm-5-3-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill