DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 19.7 points higher (43.9 vs 24.2) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 43.9 | +81.4% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 81.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $159.30 | $238.53 | +49.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 49.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 99.17s | 11.16s | −88.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 88.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max): 81.4% more intelligence, 49.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/gpt-6-1-terra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/gpt-6-1-terra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill