DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 18.0 points higher (42.2 vs 24.2) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $149; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 24.2, and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) when 24.2 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 42.2 | +74.4% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 74.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.48 | $1,630.69 | +990.9% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 103.74s | 12.90s | −87.6% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 87.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max): 74.4% more intelligence, 990.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill