DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) vs Mistral Small 3.1
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) by DeepSeek or Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) scores 17.1 points higher (24.2 vs 7.1) but costs 5.4× as much to run the benchmark ($149 vs $27.8; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) when you need intelligence above 7.1, and Mistral Small 3.1 when 7.1 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) | Mistral Small 3.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 7.1 | −70.7% Mistral Small 3.1 is 70.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.48 | $27.82 | −81.4% Mistral Small 3.1 is 81.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 103.74s | 11.75s | −88.7% Mistral Small 3.1 is 88.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.08 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max): 70.7% less intelligence, 81.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)Mistral Small 3.1Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill