DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) by DeepSeek or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) scores 6.7 points higher (24.2 vs 17.5) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($149 vs $146; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Glimmer (High).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 17.5 | −27.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 27.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.48 | $145.77 | −2.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 2.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 116.79s | 24.76s | −78.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 78.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max): 27.7% less intelligence, 2.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill