DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) by DeepSeek or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 2.3 points higher (26.5 vs 24.2) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 26.5 | +9.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 9.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $159.30 | $282.51 | +77.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 77.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 100.51s | 6.33s | −93.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 93.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max): 9.5% more intelligence, 77.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill