DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) by DeepSeek or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)
Trinity Large Thinking vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max): 55.4% less intelligence, 55.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.2 | 10.8 | −55.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 55.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.48 | $232.95 | +55.8% Trinity Large Thinking is 55.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 116.55s | 8.25s | −92.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 92.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.11 / $0.23 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0420 (Max)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill