DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 1.2 points higher (36.0 vs 34.8) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $1081; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 36.0 | +3.4% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 3.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $1,122.27 | +3.8% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 3.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.35s | 25.87s | +68.5% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 68.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 3.4% more intelligence, 3.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 68.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/deepseek-v4-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/deepseek-v4-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill