DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.6 Sol (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (High) scores 7.5 points higher (42.3 vs 34.8) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1487 vs $1081; both premium class). Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | GPT-5.6 Sol (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 42.3 | +21.6% GPT-5.6 Sol (High) is 21.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $1,487.34 | +37.5% GPT-5.6 Sol (High) is 37.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.08s | 13.86s | −13.8% GPT-5.6 Sol (High) is 13.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Sol (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 21.6% more intelligence, 37.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 13.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.6 Sol (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)GPT-5.6 Sol (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-5-6-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-5-6-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill