DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.6 Terra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 0.6 points higher (34.8 vs 34.2) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $768; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Terra (High).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | GPT-5.6 Terra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 34.2 | −1.7% GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is 1.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $767.78 | −29.0% GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is 29.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.46s | 6.58s | −57.4% GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is 57.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 1.7% less intelligence, 29.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)GPT-5.6 Terra (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-5-6-terra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-5-6-terra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill