DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 4.0% more intelligence, 89.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 36.2 | +4.0% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 4.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $114.52 | −89.4% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 89.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.19s | 6.78s | −55.4% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 55.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-6-1-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-6-1-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill