DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Low) scores 11.0 points higher (45.8 vs 34.8) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1537 vs $1081; both premium class). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 45.8 | +31.6% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 31.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $1,536.78 | +42.1% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 42.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.00s | 12.01s | −24.9% GPT-6 Astra (Low) is 24.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 31.6% more intelligence, 42.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)GPT-6 Astra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-6-astra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-6-astra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill