DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs GPT-6 Luna (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 1.9 points higher (34.8 vs 32.9) but costs 23× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $47.9; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when you need intelligence above 32.9, and GPT-6 Luna (High) when 32.9 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | GPT-6 Luna (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 32.9 | −5.5% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 5.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $47.85 | −95.6% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 95.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.37s | 12.43s | −19.1% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 19.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 5.5% less intelligence, 95.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)GPT-6 Luna (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-6-luna-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/gpt-6-luna-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill