DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 20.8 points higher (34.8 vs 14.0) but costs 4.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $250; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when you need intelligence above 14.0, and Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) when 14.0 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 14.0 | −59.8% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 59.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $250.37 | −76.8% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 76.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.00s | 5.89s | −63.2% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 63.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 59.8% less intelligence, 76.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/grok-4-3-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/grok-4-3-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill