DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 59.2% less intelligence, 16.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 11.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 14.2 | −59.2% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 59.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $1,263.80 | +16.9% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 16.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 17.77s | +11.4% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 11.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill