DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 17.3 points higher (34.8 vs 17.5) but costs 7.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $146; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 17.5 | −49.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 49.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $145.77 | −86.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 86.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.35s | 24.76s | +61.3% Muse Glimmer (High) is 61.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 49.7% less intelligence, 86.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 61.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill