DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
34.80
Total cost
$1081
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)34.826.7−23.3% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 23.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,081.42Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)15.95s16.87s+5.8% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 5.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.44 / $1.32$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill