DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 19.2 points higher (34.8 vs 15.6) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $661; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 15.6 | −55.2% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 55.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $661.29 | −38.8% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 38.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.95s | 21.36s | +33.9% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 33.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 55.2% less intelligence, 38.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill