DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 38.5% less intelligence, 5.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 592.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 21.4 | −38.5% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 38.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,081.42 | $1,145.36 | +5.9% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 5.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.00s | 110.87s | +592.9% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 592.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill